Ticket 7860 - A new state for Pending nodes ?
Summary: A new state for Pending nodes ?
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of ticket 7770
Alias: None
Product: Slurm
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Scheduling (show other tickets)
Version: 18.08.6
Hardware: Cray XC Linux
: 4 - Minor Issue
Assignee: Director of Support
QA Contact:
URL:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-10-03 23:07 MDT by Maciej Cytowski
Modified: 2020-07-24 10:17 MDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Site: Pawsey
Slinky Site: ---
Alineos Sites: ---
Atos/Eviden Sites: ---
Confidential Site: ---
Coreweave sites: ---
Cray Sites: ---
DS9 clusters: ---
Google sites: ---
HPCnow Sites: ---
HPE Sites: ---
IBM Sites: ---
NOAA SIte: ---
NoveTech Sites: ---
Nvidia HWinf-CS Sites: ---
OCF Sites: ---
Recursion Pharma Sites: ---
SFW Sites: ---
SNIC sites: ---
Tzag Elita Sites: ---
Linux Distro: ---
Machine Name:
CLE Version:
Version Fixed:
Target Release: ---
DevPrio: ---
Emory-Cloud Sites: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this ticket.
Description Maciej Cytowski 2019-10-03 23:07:06 MDT
Hi all,

I am contacting you to ask if it would be possible to have a new state in Slurm for Pending nodes so the user can identify nodes that are already assigned to a job that hasn't started yet instead of just being marked as Idle ?

Kind regards,
Maciej
Comment 3 Jason Booth 2019-10-04 13:46:07 MDT
Hi Maciej - thank you for the suggestions. We are tracking a similar request in 7770 and so I am making this as a duplicate.

*** This ticket has been marked as a duplicate of ticket 7770 ***
Comment 4 Maciej Cytowski 2020-07-23 08:06:17 MDT
Hi Jason,

I was following 7770 but did not see any updates there for a long time. Are there chances to have this addressed in future SLURM releases?

Kind regards,
Maciej
Comment 5 Jason Booth 2020-07-24 10:17:07 MDT
Hi Maciej - we are tracking this via bug# 7770 and so we are not actively watching this bug. You can reply to the other linked bug. I have also made our team aware of your request here however it would still be good to have your ask in bug# 7770.