This is just a question related to our plans to upgrade from 17.02 to 17.11: I'd like to ensure a smooth upgrading experience, so I'm worried about the issue "MariaDB lock problems for sacctmgr delete query" reported to the slurm-users list on Feb. 13. Apparently SchedMD has a bug fix in Bug 4785, but we're not allowed to see it. Questions: 1. Will Bug 4785 be resolved in 17.11.4? 2. Is it likely that an upgrade from 17.02 to 17.11 will encounter this issue? FYI: I've already made a dry run test upgrade of our 17.02.9 database to 17.11.3 without encountering any problems. I reported this to the slurm-users list on Feb. 16. My dry run upgrade procedure is documented in https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/niflheim/Slurm_installation#make-a-dry-run-database-upgrade Thanks, Ole
(In reply to Ole.H.Nielsen@fysik.dtu.dk from comment #0) > This is just a question related to our plans to upgrade from 17.02 to 17.11: > > I'd like to ensure a smooth upgrading experience, so I'm worried about the > issue "MariaDB lock problems for sacctmgr delete query" reported to the > slurm-users list on Feb. 13. Apparently SchedMD has a bug fix in Bug 4785, > but we're not allowed to see it. > > Questions: > > 1. Will Bug 4785 be resolved in 17.11.4? No. The entirety of the bug was some internal discussion leading to this commit on the master branch, which will be 18.08.0-pre2 and up: https://github.com/SchedMD/slurm/commit/4a16541bf0e00 It leads to a small change in behavior (association ids are no longer densely packed), and thus was not considered appropriate for a maintenance release. > 2. Is it likely that an upgrade from 17.02 to 17.11 will encounter this > issue? No. If you're not seeing issues now, you likely won't in 17.11. You'll note Jessica's email mentions a switch in their database at the same time - I'm guessing there is some other relevant changes that exposed this as an issue. The AUTO_INCREMENT behavior itself has remained unchanged for quite a while - it's much older than 17.02. Preemptively tagging this as resolved/infogiven; please reopen if you have any further questions. - Tim
(In reply to Tim Wickberg from comment #1) Thanks Tim! This sounds good to me. /Ole