Ticket 21246 - There is a significant discrepancy in the results produced for GPU hour utilization by the sacct and sreport commands in SLURM
Summary: There is a significant discrepancy in the results produced for GPU hour utili...
Status: OPEN
Alias: None
Product: Slurm
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Accounting (show other tickets)
Version: 24.11.x
Hardware: Linux Linux
: 6 - No support contract
Assignee: Jacob Jenson
QA Contact:
URL:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-10-23 03:59 MDT by Manisha
Modified: 2024-10-23 03:59 MDT (History)
0 users

See Also:
Site: -Other-
Alineos Sites: ---
Atos/Eviden Sites: ---
Confidential Site: ---
Coreweave sites: ---
Cray Sites: ---
DS9 clusters: ---
HPCnow Sites: ---
HPE Sites: ---
IBM Sites: ---
NOAA SIte: ---
NoveTech Sites: ---
Nvidia HWinf-CS Sites: ---
OCF Sites: ---
Recursion Pharma Sites: ---
SFW Sites: ---
SNIC sites: ---
Tzag Elita Sites: ---
Linux Distro: ---
Machine Name:
CLE Version:
Version Fixed:
Target Release: ---
DevPrio: ---
Emory-Cloud Sites: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this ticket.
Description Manisha 2024-10-23 03:59:39 MDT 
I am trying to find the GPU hour utilization for a user during a specific time period using the sacct and sreport commands. However, I am noticing a significant difference between the outputs of these two commands.

Could you explain the reasons for this discrepancy? Are there specific factors or configurations in SLURM that could lead to variations in the reported GPU hours?