Dear support team, I wonder how to elevate the role of a user from a slurm account, so that this special user can manage/cancel jobs belong to other users within the account group. I read about AdminLevel about assigning individual user different roles, such as Operator and etc, but not clear enough for me how to config. The bottomline has to be able to constrain the elevated admin function within his/her own account group. Thank you, Wei
Hi Wei, It sounds like configuring a user as a coordinator for an account should do what you want. This will allow the coordinator to have special privileges for the account they are coordinator over, but won't grant them any special privileges anywhere else. Here's an example where I make 'user1' a coordinator over the 'sub1' account. $ sacctmgr add coordinator account=sub1 user=user1 Adding Coordinator User(s) user1 To Account(s) and all sub-accounts sub1 Would you like to commit changes? (You have 30 seconds to decide) (N/y): y $ sacctmgr show user user1 withcoord User Def Acct Def WCKey Admin Coord Accounts ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- -------------------- user1 sub1 None sub1 To demonstrate how this works, I submit two jobs as 'user2', one to the 'sub1' account and the other to the 'sub2' account. user2@kitt:~$ sbatch -n24 -Asub1 --wrap='srun sleep 600' Submitted batch job 9993 user2@kitt:~$ sbatch -n24 -Asub2 --wrap='srun sleep 600' Submitted batch job 9994 Then as 'user1' when I run squeue I can only see the job that is in the 'sub1' account. When I try to delete the job in the 'sub2' account it rejects the request. It does, however, let me delete the job in the 'sub1' account. user1@kitt:~$ squeue JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES NODELIST(REASON) 9993 debug wrap user2 R 0:18 1 node10 user1@kitt:~$ scancel 9994 scancel: error: Kill job error on job id 9994: Access/permission denied user1@kitt:~$ scancel 9993 user1@kitt:~$ squeue JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES NODELIST(REASON) 9993 debug wrap user2 CG 0:34 1 node10 Let me know if this doesn't look like what you were hoping, or if you have any questions about it. Thanks, Ben
Hi Ben, Yes, the solution you provided is exactly what I am looking for. It works perfectly! Many thanks, Wei On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:29 AM <bugs@schedmd.com> wrote: > *Comment # 1 <https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16236#c1> on bug > 16236 <https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=16236> from Ben Roberts > <ben@schedmd.com> * > > Hi Wei, > > It sounds like configuring a user as a coordinator for an account should do > what you want. This will allow the coordinator to have special privileges for > the account they are coordinator over, but won't grant them any special > privileges anywhere else. Here's an example where I make 'user1' a coordinator > over the 'sub1' account. > > $ sacctmgr add coordinator account=sub1 user=user1 > Adding Coordinator User(s) > user1 > To Account(s) and all sub-accounts > sub1 > Would you like to commit changes? (You have 30 seconds to decide) > (N/y): y > > > $ sacctmgr show user user1 withcoord > User Def Acct Def WCKey Admin Coord Accounts > ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- -------------------- > user1 sub1 None sub1 > > > > > To demonstrate how this works, I submit two jobs as 'user2', one to the 'sub1' > account and the other to the 'sub2' account. > > user2@kitt:~$ sbatch -n24 -Asub1 --wrap='srun sleep 600' > Submitted batch job 9993 > user2@kitt:~$ sbatch -n24 -Asub2 --wrap='srun sleep 600' > Submitted batch job 9994 > > > Then as 'user1' when I run squeue I can only see the job that is in the 'sub1' > account. When I try to delete the job in the 'sub2' account it rejects the > request. It does, however, let me delete the job in the 'sub1' account. > > user1@kitt:~$ squeue > JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES > NODELIST(REASON) > 9993 debug wrap user2 R 0:18 1 node10 > user1@kitt:~$ scancel 9994 > scancel: error: Kill job error on job id 9994: Access/permission denied > user1@kitt:~$ scancel 9993 > user1@kitt:~$ squeue > JOBID PARTITION NAME USER ST TIME NODES > NODELIST(REASON) > 9993 debug wrap user2 CG 0:34 1 node10 > > > Let me know if this doesn't look like what you were hoping, or if you have any > questions about it. > > Thanks, > Ben > > ------------------------------ > You are receiving this mail because: > > - You reported the bug. > >
I'm glad to hear that works for you. I'll go ahead and close this ticket. Thanks, Ben