Ticket 12798 - missing symbol
Summary: missing symbol
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of ticket 12396
Alias: None
Product: Slurm
Classification: Unclassified
Component: PMIx (show other tickets)
Version: 21.08.2
Hardware: Linux Linux
: C - Contributions
Assignee: Tim Wickberg
QA Contact:
URL:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2021-11-01 13:33 MDT by mike coyne
Modified: 2021-11-01 13:57 MDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Site: LANL
Alineos Sites: ---
Atos/Eviden Sites: ---
Confidential Site: ---
Coreweave sites: ---
Cray Sites: ---
DS9 clusters: ---
HPCnow Sites: ---
HPE Sites: ---
IBM Sites: ---
NOAA SIte: ---
NoveTech Sites: ---
Nvidia HWinf-CS Sites: ---
OCF Sites: ---
Recursion Pharma Sites: ---
SFW Sites: ---
SNIC sites: ---
Tzag Elita Sites: ---
Linux Distro: RHEL
Machine Name: kit test clluster
CLE Version:
Version Fixed:
Target Release: ---
DevPrio: ---
Emory-Cloud Sites: ---

Attachments
pmix_v4 plugin type proposed definition patch (594 bytes, patch)
2021-11-01 13:33 MDT, mike coyne 		Details | Diff
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this ticket.
Description mike coyne 2021-11-01 13:33:41 MDT 
Created attachment 22061 [details]
pmix_v4 plugin type proposed definition patch

srun: error: plugin_load_from_file: dlopen(/usr/lib64/slurm/mpi_pmix_v4.so): /usr/lib64/slurm/mpi_pmix_v4.so: undefined symbol: plugin_type
srun: error: Couldn't load specified plugin name for mpi/pmix_v4: Dlopen of plugin file failed
srun: error: cannot create mpi context for mpi/pmix_v4
srun: error: invalid MPI type 'pmix_v4', --mpi=list for acceptable types
...
the symbol plugin type seems to be defined in
src/plugins/mpi/pmix/mpi_pmix.c

the attached patch seems to have corrected this issue.
i will report back any additional issue i find.
Comment 1 Jason Booth 2021-11-01 13:57:10 MDT 
Hi Mike I am marking this as a duplicate of 12396 where we have a discussion going on currently about this topic.

Both of these issues are directly related to this, where 12396 is honestly a duplicate of 7263, but the conversation is more active on 12396.


bug#7263
bug#12396

*** This ticket has been marked as a duplicate of ticket 12396 ***