Ticket 8763

Summary: threadsafety of jobacct_gather/cgroup
Product: Slurm Reporter: Nate Rini <nate>
Component: slurmdAssignee: Unassigned Developer <dev-unassigned>
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE QA Contact:
Severity: 5 - Enhancement    
Priority: --- CC: felip.moll, lyeager
Version: 20.11.x   
Hardware: Linux   
OS: Linux   
See Also: https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=8656
https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7617
Site: SchedMD Slinky Site: ---
Alineos Sites: --- Atos/Eviden Sites: ---
Confidential Site: --- Coreweave sites: ---
Cray Sites: --- DS9 clusters: ---
Google sites: --- HPCnow Sites: ---
HPE Sites: --- IBM Sites: ---
NOAA SIte: --- NoveTech Sites: ---
Nvidia HWinf-CS Sites: --- OCF Sites: ---
Recursion Pharma Sites: --- SFW Sites: ---
SNIC sites: --- Tzag Elita Sites: ---
Linux Distro: --- Machine Name:
CLE Version: Version Fixed:
Target Release: --- DevPrio: ---
Emory-Cloud Sites: ---

Description Nate Rini 2020-03-31 12:24:01 MDT 

    


    


      



        
          Comment 1
        

        
          Nate Rini

        

        
        

        
          2020-03-31 12:25:16 MDT
        

      






Multiple race conditions have been found (bug #8656 and bug #7617) suggesting the whole jobacct_gather/cgroup plugin needs to be verified for thread safety.

    


    


      



        
          Comment 2
        

        
          Felip Moll

        

        
        

        
          2020-04-01 04:05:05 MDT
        

      






The cgroup plugins have races between them on the management of cgroups.

https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7536

    


    


      



        
          Comment 3
        

        
          Tim Wickberg

        

        
        

        
          2020-08-06 19:15:14 MDT
        

      






Is this bug meant to capture anything that's not already on bug 8656, or one of the other cgroup cleanup tickets? (I'll note Danny has already done a large amount of cleanup on master in July, and this may or may not still be a concern after that refactoring went through.)

If not, please close as a duplicate.

    


    


      



        
          Comment 4
        

        
          Nate Rini

        

        
        

        
          2020-08-18 14:53:19 MDT
        

      






(In reply to Tim Wickberg from comment #3)
> Is this bug meant to capture anything that's not already on bug 8656, or one
> of the other cgroup cleanup tickets? (I'll note Danny has already done a
> large amount of cleanup on master in July, and this may or may not still be
> a concern after that refactoring went through.)
> 
> If not, please close as a duplicate.

done

*** This ticket has been marked as a duplicate of ticket 8656 ***