| Summary: | Sbatch verbose output returns wrong jobid | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Slurm | Reporter: | Davide Vanzo <davide.vanzo> |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | Director of Support <support> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INFOGIVEN | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | 4 - Minor Issue | ||
| Priority: | --- | ||
| Version: | 17.02.6 | ||
| Hardware: | Linux | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Site: | Vanderbilt | Alineos Sites: | --- |
| Atos/Eviden Sites: | --- | Confidential Site: | --- |
| Coreweave sites: | --- | Cray Sites: | --- |
| DS9 clusters: | --- | HPCnow Sites: | --- |
| HPE Sites: | --- | IBM Sites: | --- |
| NOAA SIte: | --- | OCF Sites: | --- |
| Recursion Pharma Sites: | --- | SFW Sites: | --- |
| SNIC sites: | --- | Linux Distro: | --- |
| Machine Name: | CLE Version: | ||
| Version Fixed: | Target Release: | --- | |
| DevPrio: | --- | Emory-Cloud Sites: | --- |
|
Description
Davide Vanzo
2017-08-17 11:45:55 MDT
Hello Davide, Actually, the number 4294967294 (0xfffffffe) is Slurm's internal representation of "not set" or NO_VAL as it's referred to in the code. In this case, the job hasn't received an allocation and job_id yet from the slurmctld so it's set to NO_VAL. There are several other fields that are also set to NO_VAL. Hope that helps. Regards. Tim Tim, It makes totally sense now. Thank you for the clarification. Please close the ticket. Have a great day! Davide Resolving. |