Summary: | slurm_pam_adopt misses some cgroup subsystems | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Slurm | Reporter: | Kilian Cavalotti <kilian> |
Component: | Other | Assignee: | Tim Wickberg <tim> |
Status: | RESOLVED INFOGIVEN | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | 4 - Minor Issue | ||
Priority: | --- | ||
Version: | 17.02.1 | ||
Hardware: | Linux | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.schedmd.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5920 | ||
Site: | Stanford | Alineos Sites: | --- |
Atos/Eviden Sites: | --- | Confidential Site: | --- |
Coreweave sites: | --- | Cray Sites: | --- |
DS9 clusters: | --- | HPCnow Sites: | --- |
HPE Sites: | --- | IBM Sites: | --- |
NOAA SIte: | --- | NoveTech Sites: | --- |
Nvidia HWinf-CS Sites: | --- | OCF Sites: | --- |
Recursion Pharma Sites: | --- | SFW Sites: | --- |
SNIC sites: | --- | Tzag Elita Sites: | --- |
Linux Distro: | --- | Machine Name: | |
CLE Version: | Version Fixed: | ||
Target Release: | --- | DevPrio: | --- |
Emory-Cloud Sites: | --- |
Description
Kilian Cavalotti
2017-04-06 17:59:24 MDT
Did you disable pam_systemd in the various PAM configs? The output you've given suggests it may still be enabled. (In reply to Tim Wickberg from comment #1) > Did you disable pam_systemd in the various PAM configs? The output you've > given suggests it may still be enabled. Wow, spot on, thanks Tim! That's exactly it, disabling pam_systemd fixes the issue. And I see there's a note in the Readme too, I missed it. Thanks! -- Kilian Forgot to close the ticket. Done. |