Summary: | Max number of instances of 1 job array. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Slurm | Reporter: | paull |
Component: | Scheduling | Assignee: | Moe Jette <jette> |
Status: | RESOLVED CANNOTREPRODUCE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | 4 - Minor Issue | ||
Priority: | --- | CC: | alex |
Version: | 14.11.10 | ||
Hardware: | Linux | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Site: | DownUnder GeoSolutions | Alineos Sites: | --- |
Atos/Eviden Sites: | --- | Confidential Site: | --- |
Coreweave sites: | --- | Cray Sites: | --- |
DS9 clusters: | --- | HPCnow Sites: | --- |
HPE Sites: | --- | IBM Sites: | --- |
NOAA SIte: | --- | NoveTech Sites: | --- |
Nvidia HWinf-CS Sites: | --- | OCF Sites: | --- |
Recursion Pharma Sites: | --- | SFW Sites: | --- |
SNIC sites: | --- | Tzag Elita Sites: | --- |
Linux Distro: | --- | Machine Name: | |
CLE Version: | Version Fixed: | ||
Target Release: | --- | DevPrio: | --- |
Emory-Cloud Sites: | --- |
Description
paull
2016-08-12 07:54:51 MDT
Would a mechanism to limit the number of tasks from a job array that can be running at any time be sufficient? Relevant documentation below: "A maximum number of simultaneously running tasks from the job array may be specified using a "%" separator. For example "--array=0-15%4" will limit the number of simultaneously running tasks from this job array to 4." This count can be altered on job already submitted using the scontrol command. for example: scontrol update jobid=1234 ArrayTaskThrottle=4 ArrayTaskThrottle=<count> Speciify the maximum number of tasks in a job array that can execute at the same time. Set the count to zero in order to eliminate any limit. The task throttle count for a job array is reported as part of its ArrayTaskId field, preceded with a percent sign. For example "ArrayTaskId=1-10%2" indicates the maximum number of running tasks is limited to 2. Hi Moe, Thanks for your response. This may be exactly what the doctor ordered, but I will follow up after getting the green light from our team. Thanks, Paul Also, would it be possible to get some insight on ticket #2965? (In reply to paull from comment #5) > Also, would it be possible to get some insight on ticket #2965? The last comment there was from Tim asking for some logs... Moe, Thanks for your help. I don't have an update as of yet on if this is what they team needs or not. As soon as I do I will update this ticket. Thanks! Paul Moe, Since we will be updating soon, I don't see a need for this to stay open. The solution you provided has been helpful. Thanks! Paul |